I don’t really have time to be blogging right now, but there are just a few things that have popped up lately that have my ire going enough that it can’t wait…
First, in today’s news on CNN, we have confirmation that Cain may have actually done something wrong. Is it because a woman came forward and reported it? Nope, we’ve gone back to “good ole days” standards: it’s because the boyfriend of the victim reported it.
Yeah, I wish I was kidding, but there’s the headline – “Former boyfriend of Cain accuser backs her account.” Wow, thanks, ex-boyfriend! Now we can believe her!
And if that was the only thing in recent days to get me going, I probably wouldn’t be writing this now, but sadly, there’s more…
In today’s news in Sweden (going a bit afield, but hey…), a high school principal was kind enough to tell one of his female students “Guys do this kind of thing, you have to get used to it.” when she got up her nerve to tell him she’d been raped. He discouraged her from going forward to the police because – “this is not a prioritized case as no serious crime has been committed.”
And it only gets better (worse?)…
In Turkey, just over a week ago, 26 men who had been convicted of having sex with a 13 year old girl were told it was okay because it was “consensual.” We can ignore the fact that they were paying money to two adults for “repeated access to the girl” for just over six months. Personally, though, my favorite part of the article is when it mentions that “any rape or sexual assault [that] happened with the consent of the girl or the woman, then the sentence would be reduced.” Ummm, consent? Rape? Aren’t these kind of contradictory terms?
But, hey, at least we have the right idea here in America. Don’t we? Nah, I guess we don’t. Because, according to an “excellent” (read: heavy sarcasm) article on CNN again, we should “make a rule on sexual harassment.”
The highlights that CNN is kind enough to pull out on the side, according to expert Barbara Risman, “society hasn’t reached consensus on what’s OK in the workplace.” Cause, you know, we don’t have any rules in place that are based on a consensus of what shouldn’t be done. In fact, in her brilliance, she suggests rules that make it “illegal for bosses to make sexual overtures to subordinates.”
Don’t we already have those rules? And that consensus? I could swear there’s this who thing…what’s it called? Oh, yeah, the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission… They talk all about laws and regulations and prohibited practices…so are those “rules”?
Maybe we can’t fix problems in other countries (unless you talk to the Republicans), but we sure should be able to fix them here.